Conflicts between Iraq and Israel before and during World
War II did not only affect the Jewish people who lived in Israel, but also effected
Iraqi citizens who were Jewish. Iraq’s Anti-Semitic Legislation, created in
1933, gave the Jewish citizens a very tight leash during the beginning of the
war and started to persecute them due to the conflicts between them and Israel.
During the 1950’s, Iraqi secret police were ordered to raid homes in the Jewish
communities, mostly in Baghdad, to search for any evidence of Zionist
sentiments, which were artifacts supporting the development of Israel. In this specific
case, we will look at personal items found in one home which had very little
value, but is now is the topic of Iraq’s
ministry of Culture and Antiquities .
The items that are being so widely discussed consists of
early Torah’s, children’s learning material, family photos and a few other
personal belongings. The Iraqi Ministry of Culture and Antiquities had sent
them to the United States to take care of them. They had made an agreement in
2003 that America would restore the artifacts and return them in 2005. The
problem is that it is now 2012 and the artifacts are not back in the hands of Iraq.
Liwaa Saisim, Iraqi Tourism and Archeology Minister has even gone as far as not
letting archeological explorations continue by the United States in Iraq until
the artifacts are back in Iraq.
So the question here is, why hasn’t the United States given
back these pieces of Iraqi history? And another big question is why is Iraq so
interested in repatriating these objects? The United States has been doing
research on these items that will ultimately cost up to six million dollars,
and they want to do the most that they can and complete their studies, although
the U.S. acknowledges that Iraq has the right to make their claims. As for
Iraq, they want the items back not for monetary value, but for the sake of
informing their citizens. Saad Eskander, the director of the Iraq National Library
of Archives, makes a great point when he says, “Iraqis must know that we are a
diverse people, with different traditions, different religions, and we need to
accept this diversity…To show it to our people that Baghdad was always
multi-ethnic.”
Ultimately, I feel that that Iraq should have the artifacts
back. Not only because there are legal documents that state the claim of the
artifacts, but also for the sake of Iraqi people today. Saad Eskander’s
statement applies to the way of living in Iraq today, because history still
effects the present day and Iraqi people need to see that diversity was okay in
their past and should be okay in their present day lives. It is possible to
co-exist, but the public needs proof that it has happened, it can happen, and
it will happen.
So you all know my stance on the issue, now what do you all
think; Who do these artifacts belong to? Please respond in the comment box
bellow!
-Rachel Armus

I agree when you say that Iraq should have the artifacts back because if they want them to inform their people on history then we should not deny them that right. They are supposed to be there in the first place.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the United States should give back the artifacts to Iraq because the two countries made an agreement and the U.S. has been ignoring that.
ReplyDeleteRachel, I think this is among the most thought-provoking blog entries of the semester. This example demonstrates the many stakeholders these issues. If these objects are returned to Iraq, where would they be housed? Would they be returned to the Jewish community?
ReplyDelete